Your board is lying.
Not on purpose.
The truth got said in a standup, typed into a thread, implied by a commit — and none of it made it back to the ticket. Brieferr catches it, cites it, and proposes the fix.
Get early access7 places said something about your board. 3 drifted.
It was already said
Six places knew before your board did. Brieferr reads them, maps each line to a work item, and hands back one brief you can check.
A pull request on your project’s reality.
Brieferr never edits your board on its own. It opens a diff, you merge it, and every rejection teaches the mapping.
One org’s context, one remark lit up.
Seven things got said this week. Six arrived with a ticket number under them. The one that didn’t is lit — and it still lands on PAY-204.
Open any claim and the evidence is right there.
Nothing is asserted without a source. Every line in the brief drills to the exact events it was built from — timestamps, authors, and how confident the mapping was.
Two of the three sources below never mention PAY-204. No search would have found them. They were mapped as they arrived.
- you approve — nothing writes itself
- reject once and the mapping learns your language
- Jira stays the system of record
Your tools already said it.
Brieferr is the one listening.
Read-only on every source. Brieferr writes to exactly one place — your board — and only after you approve the diff.
Ten teams. Then we stop and listen.
We’d rather get ten boards genuinely true than a thousand names on a list. Tell us what you use.