Know where your project
actually stands.
The truth got said in a standup, typed into a thread, implied by a commit — and none of it made it back to the ticket. Brieferr catches it, cites it, and proposes the fix — yours to approve.
Get early access7 places said something about your work. 3 drifted.
It was already said
Six places knew before Jira or Linear did. Brieferr reads them, maps each line to a work item, and hands back one brief you can check.
A pull request on your project’s reality.
Brieferr never edits Jira or Linear on its own. It opens a diff, you merge it, and every rejection teaches the mapping.
One org’s context, one remark lit up.
Seven things got said this week. Six arrived with a ticket number under them. The one that didn’t is lit — and it still lands on PAY-204.
Open any claim and the evidence is right there.
Nothing is asserted without a source. Every line in the brief drills to the exact events it was built from — timestamps, authors, and how confident the mapping was.
Two of the three sources below never mention PAY-204. No search would have found them. They were mapped as they arrived.
- you approve — nothing writes itself
- reject once and the mapping learns your language
- Jira stays the system of record
Your tools already said it.
Brieferr is the one listening.
Read-only on every source. Brieferr writes to exactly one place — Jira or Linear — and only after you approve the diff.
A short list, on purpose.
We’d rather get a few projects genuinely true than collect a thousand names. Tell us what you use.
Get early access